Bid + scope
Price the actual work before it grows.
List outputs, review cycles, meeting time, dependencies and exclusions. Identify who maintains each deliverable.
Priced hours against hours needed for the agreed outputs.

Understand where the effort goes, how the trade could benefit and what can eat the savings before they reach you.
Try the value calculator ↓At an illustrative CAD $30 to $150 per hour, one modeller assigned 165 hours a month represents $4,950 to $24,750 per month. Over a three-month coordination project, that is 495 hours and $14,850 to $74,250.
This is a planning range, not a verified Canadian industry average. It assumes one modeller spends all 165 allocated hours each month on this work. It is a cost per person, not a fixed price per model: model size, trade scope, inputs and review cycles change the effort.
| Hourly rate | Monthly burn 165 hours | Three-month total 495 hours |
|---|---|---|
| $30/hr | $4,950 | $14,850 |
| $60/hr | $9,900 | $29,700 |
| $90/hr | $14,850 | $44,550 |
| $120/hr | $19,800 | $59,400 |
| $150/hr | $24,750 | $74,250 |
Make that modelling investment work for the trade. When the model supports automation and prefabrication, it should help reduce repeated detailing, improve fabrication information and support smoother installation. Measure the benefit against the complete modelling, setup, checking and correction effort. Coordination acceptance and authorised fabrication release remain separate decisions.
Monthly: hourly rate × 165 hours. Three months: monthly cost × 3.
An employee wage, an internal cost rate and a supplier's billed rate are different. If starting with wages, account for employer costs, software, hardware, support and overhead. If using a quoted or fully loaded rate, confirm what it already includes so you do not count costs twice.
Price meetings, checking, revisions, exports and fabrication support within the hours or as separate allowances. At the same allocation, one extra month adds another $4,950 to $24,750. Late decisions and repeat coordination use time that needs to be accounted for.
BIM can support better decisions and handoffs. The benefit depends on the task, the information and the people using it. Owning a model or a software licence does not establish a saving.
These are BIMTA opportunities to test on your own workflow, not promised savings. Agree what changes, who benefits and how you will measure the difference.
Price the actual work before it grows.
List outputs, review cycles, meeting time, dependencies and exclusions. Identify who maintains each deliverable.
Priced hours against hours needed for the agreed outputs.
Reduce repeated take-offs and avoidable ordering corrections.
Check units, filters, exclusions and measurement rules. Add the purchasing allowances the model does not contain.
Time to a checked quantity package; quantity corrections and returns.
Resolve selected problems while changes are still manageable.
Use relevant model revisions, agreed tests, assigned issues and a clear decision deadline.
Verified issues resolved before release; review and correction hours.
Make useful information flow into the shop.
Confirm components, dimensions, connections, assemblies and the person authorised to release production.
Time to an accepted shop package; fabrication corrections and scrap.
Reduce searching, repeated layout and avoidable field corrections.
Deliver the right revision, usable layout information and a way to bring field changes back.
Time spent finding information, installation hours and recorded rework.
Avoid reconstructing agreed information at the end.
Agree required asset information early. Capture it once, maintain it and test the receiver’s acceptance checks.
Collection effort, rejected records and correction time.
What must the receiver be able to use?
Include production, checking and change.
Name who accepts and authorises the work.
Read the contract and the documents it incorporates with the responsible commercial team. Turn unclear requirements into specific questions before committing resources.
A useful pricing starting point is planned hours at your internal cost, attributable tools and support, then your company’s commercial allowances. A billing rate and an internal labour cost serve different purposes. This page does not determine contractual entitlement.
Use the Before You Price BIM checklist →Time released can create capacity. It becomes a cash reduction when actual spending falls, such as paid overtime or outsourced effort. The two should be recorded separately.
Invented example values. Change them to explore an assumption. Entries stay on this page and are not submitted or saved.
Positive in this scenario. Verify the assumptions and what benefit the trade actually keeps.
Capacity value is not verified cash saving or net profit. Only entered costs are included. Cost recovery assumes the same time difference and labour cost on every repetition, with no further setup cost.
Hours released = (current minutes − proposed minutes) × repetitions ÷ 60. Labour capacity value = hours released × assumed hourly cost. Extra cost = additional setup hours × hourly cost + tools and support. Modelled net value = capacity value − extra cost.
Cost recovery is the entered extra cost divided by positive value per repetition, rounded up. It describes recovery in this capacity model, not a cash payback forecast. Add recurring checking and correction time to each task; add one-off effort to setup, once. Taxes, financing, revenue changes and risks are not separately modelled.
Ask these questions early, while the scope and method can still be improved.
The trade creates the information, another party receives the benefit, and the trade absorbs the effort.
Do this: Name the producer, beneficiary, payer and acceptance owner before committing.
Extra fields, meetings, exports and review cycles consume an allowance that was never priced for them.
Do this: Keep a deliverable register and use the project’s agreed clarification and change process.
A route fits, but manufacturing, connections or site conditions have not been checked.
Do this: Keep coordination acceptance and fabrication release as explicit, separate decisions.
The tool runs quickly, while cleanup, corrections and maintenance increase.
Do this: Measure the full accepted task, including failed attempts and support.
The model becomes expensive to produce without helping the shop, field or receiver.
Do this: Require a named use and acceptance check for requested detail and data.
Released hours are counted as both labour saving and extra profit without evidence of either.
Do this: Keep capacity, actual cash reduction and additional revenue separate.
Preparation + execution + checking + correction.
Count the complete task.
The cost opportunities, pitfalls and calculator are original BIMTA educational guidance. No industry savings percentage is claimed. The references below provide planning and information-management context, not a forecast for your trade.
Need to develop the skill behind the result?
BIM training + Canadian trade schools ↗Ask a general question in Trade Q&A ↗