BIMTA / RIGHT INFORMATION. REAL VALUE.
BIMTACANADIAN BIM
TRADE ALLIANCE
The Trade BriefResource desk
Learn + tools
BIM Trade ForumAbout + contact
Original architectural illustration of digital construction in Canada
BIM IN CANADA / RESEARCH EDITION 01

What is being used.
Where.
And for what.

Canadian project evidence, BIM tools and AI developments. Read the date. Follow the source. Bring the lesson back to your trade.

Explore the project evidence ↓
REVIEWED 17 OCTOBER 2026
RECENT CANADIAN DEVELOPMENTS

Useful signals.
With a source.

This is a dated research snapshot, not a live news feed. Project updates, documented case studies and announced pilots each tell us something different.

OWNER PROJECT UPDATE

Centre Block: model information reaches the trades.

PSPC describes combining scans, photographs and drawings in a model and database used for site visualisation and asset tracking. Its stone-restoration example connects condition records with time and cost. The video does not identify the software brands.

Public Services and Procurement Canada ↗
INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT

Canada and the UK agree to work on digital construction.

Connected Places Catapult reports an agreement between the UK and NRC Canada to collaborate on BIM adoption, knowledge exchange and project delivery. This is a collaboration framework; it does not create a software requirement for every Canadian project.

Connected Places Catapult ↗
RESEARCH CHALLENGE / CLOSED

AI checking is being asked to show its working.

An NRC-sponsored challenge sought prototypes for checking 2D drawings and BIM against digital construction codes, with human review and traceable results. The application window has closed. The call is evidence of research demand, not proof of an operating permit-approval system.

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada ↗
READ THE EVIDENCE LEVEL

A project story
is a starting point.

It shows a documented use, not the software on every Canadian project. A vendor case study can be useful while still being promotional.

Owner or contractor report
First-party evidence of that project or company’s stated use.
Vendor case study
A named customer and workflow, reported by the product supplier.
Deployment or pilot announcement
An intended or announced use. Results and rollout may still be developing.
CANADIAN PROJECTS / DOCUMENTED PRACTICE

From software names
to actual work.

Search the 13 selected examples. Dates and limits stay with each record. Start with the 2025–2026 evidence, or switch to undated and earlier cases. BIMTA trade takeaways are our interpretation of the workflow.

5 of 13 documented examples · 2025–2026 evidence

Owner project update2026-05-21
Ottawa, Ontario · Public Services and Procurement Canada / project teams

Centre Block rehabilitation

BIM asset informationLaser scanningPhotographic records

PSPC’s May 2026 video describes bringing scans, photographs and drawings into models and an information database. The project uses the information for site visualisation and tracking assets. Its stone-restoration example links condition records with time and cost, showing how model information can support detailed trade work.

Owner update published May 2026

BIMTA trade takeaway

Connect each physical item to its condition, approved work, responsible team and acceptance record. Agree how field changes reach the shared record.

Evidence limit: The owner does not name the software products or versions. Do not infer Revit, Navisworks or another platform from the word BIM.

Vendor award profileNot stated; 2026 award profile
Toronto, Ontario · Scarborough Transit Connect / Metrolinx

Scarborough Subway Extension

Autodesk Construction CloudAutodesk Platform ServicesPower BISAP4D sequencing

Autodesk's 2026 award profile describes Scarborough Transit Connect using Autodesk Construction Cloud for controlled reviews, RFIs and submittals on the Scarborough Subway Extension. The account also identifies 4D sequencing, reporting that connects SAP and cloud data through Power BI, and work linking asset records to models for handover.

2026 project profile

BIMTA trade takeaway

Agree the review status, responsible reviewer and installation release before crews rely on a model or submittal.

Evidence limit: Vendor-reported program snapshot. Specific software versions and current configuration are not stated. No reported approval-rate or schedule-saving figure is treated as a benchmark for other projects.

Vendor sponsor case study2025-01-17
Toronto, Ontario · Mott MacDonald / HDR / Metrolinx

Ontario Line

ProjectWiseiTwinSYNCHROLumenRT

A January 2025 Bentley sponsor article hosted by the Transportation Association of Canada describes ProjectWise as the connected data environment for Ontario Line delivery, iTwin for web-based access, and SYNCHRO with LumenRT for 4D planning and visualization. It reports a project-team workflow, not a national standard or confirmation of current software versions.

Project workflow reported in January 2025

BIMTA trade takeaway

Agree review responsibilities and shared-model status across contracts. Include interfaces, sequence and access constraints when planning installation.

Evidence limit: Sponsor-supplied case study, not independent measurement. The January 2025 article describes delivery methods; it does not confirm today’s versions or continued use of every product.

Contractor project accountNot stated; project page lists 2026
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island · Pomerleau / Public Services and Procurement Canada

Daniel J. MacDonald Building Modernization

LiDAR scanningOpenSpace360-degree imageryAI-assisted visual documentation

Pomerleau reports using in-house LiDAR scanning to assess slab deflections and inform levelling material quantities during this federal-building modernization. The contractor also identifies OpenSpace's 360-degree imagery and AI-assisted visual record for progress documentation and coordination. This is a specific Canadian example combining measured existing conditions with a separate visual progress record.

2026 project profile

BIMTA trade takeaway

Distinguish survey-grade measurements from visual records. Define accuracy, coverage, capture dates and who approves any quantity derived from scans.

Evidence limit: The project page does not publish independent accuracy results, model-authoring software, AI error rates or quantified savings. The listed 2026 project year is not an explicit publication date or confirmed completion date.

Contractor project accountNot stated; project page lists 2026
Toronto, Ontario · Pomerleau / University of Toronto

University of Toronto Academic Wood Tower

BIM/VDCReality captureIoT moisture sensorsAI quality monitoring (product not named)

Pomerleau's Academic Wood Tower profile describes BIM/VDC for clashes, sleeves and coordinated openings, alongside reality capture of existing conditions. It also reports moisture sensors for timber and AI used to help prevent quality issues. The building's constrained site and work above an occupied facility make installation planning and condition monitoring especially relevant.

2026 project profile

BIMTA trade takeaway

Coordinate penetrations before fabrication and connect inspection responsibilities to moisture limits, site constraints and installation sequence.

Evidence limit: No BIM authoring product, AI product, algorithm, validation result or model version is named. Do not infer Revit or claim a measured AI outcome. Project year is not proof of completion.

CANADIAN FIRMS / A DIFFERENT EVIDENCE LEVEL

Beyond a single
project.

These sources describe Canadian companies’ workflows. They do not establish a named Canadian project, current software version or company-wide adoption on every job.

Vendor firm-level case studyNot stated · Ontario-based firm with Canadian and US operations; no named project

Classic Fire and Life Safety

ProcoreAcumatica ERP

Procore's account describes Classic Fire and Life Safety adopting its own project-management environment and integrating it with Acumatica. The Ontario-based fire-protection contractor uses shared project information and financial data to review labour costs, purchase orders and forecast performance across its Canadian and US operations. No individual Canadian construction project is identified.

Evidence limit: Firm-level evidence only. It does not prove Procore's BIM/model tools are used, identify a named Canadian site, specify a deployment date or independently measure savings.

Procore: Classic Fire and Life Safety Reduces Financial Risk with Procore ↗
Vendor award announcement2025-11-12 · Alberta, Canada

Apex Structural Design

Tekla StructuresTrimble Connect

Trimble recognized Apex for a complex hybrid timber-steel project using Tekla Structures and Trimble Connect. The announcement identifies custom connection modelling and trade collaboration, but does not name the project or its location. Useful recent evidence of a Canadian firm's workflow, not a verified named Canadian project.

Evidence limit: Canadian-firm evidence. The source does not identify a named Canadian project or its current software configuration.

Trimble: Trimble Announces 2025 Construction Innovation Award Winners ↗
Vendor firm-level case studyNot stated · Canadian-origin structural fabrication company; case-study project geography not specified

Canam Group

RevitBIM 360 DesignAutodesk AEC Collection

Autodesk describes Canam connecting engineering design, fabrication detailing and cloud collaboration. This can support a discussion of fabrication workflows, but the source does not establish a named Canadian project, a current deployment date or software versions. Do not use its reported reduction in issues as a general expected result.

Evidence limit: Canadian-firm evidence. The source does not identify a named Canadian project or its current software configuration.

Autodesk: Canam's streamlined processes slashes site issues ↗
THE TOOL LANDSCAPE

Follow the task.
Then the tool.

A broad map drawn from the evidence in this edition. It is not a market-share ranking, a complete software inventory or a procurement recommendation.

Autodesk names are changing.

Autodesk now describes Construction Cloud as part of Forma. Its learning guidance maps Autodesk Docs to Forma Data Management, Build to Forma Build, and Takeoff to Forma Takeoff. We keep historical names where the case source uses them. Confirm the exact service and entitlement for your project.

Read Autodesk’s naming guidance ↗
Work to supportTools in this edition’s evidenceA Canadian example
Model authoring + designRevit, Civil 3D, Inventor, Advance Steel, AutoCAD; Graphisoft Archicad

Different disciplines use different authoring tools. These examples span dated and undated delivery histories.

John Horgan Dam and Generating Station, formerly Site C ↗Pier 27 ↗
Trade coordination + fabricationNavisworks, Revizto, Revit; Tekla Structures

Model checking, fabrication information and installation review need an agreed release and revision process.

Cariboo Memorial Hospital Redevelopment ↗Cloudraker SkyBridge and Raven's Eye Cliffwalk ↗
Shared information + reviewsAutodesk Construction Cloud, ProjectWise, iTwin; BIM 360 Design, Trimble Connect

Project and firm examples describe information management and collaboration. Product names reflect each source.

Scarborough Subway Extension ↗Ontario Line ↗Canam Group ↗Apex Structural Design ↗
PDF review + model communicationBluebeam Revu, Bluebeam Studio, Revit with Codebook

The CHUM case links drawing reviews and model-derived equipment information. PDF review is a distinct task from model authoring.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) ↗
Sequence + visualisationSYNCHRO, LumenRT, InfraWorks, Artlantis

Examples include 4D planning, site context and design communication. Historic methods do not establish a current software version.

Ontario Line ↗Wye Road corridor upgrades ↗Pier 27 ↗
Capture + field verificationLiDAR, ReCap, robotic total stations, OpenSpace, 360-degree capture

Measured geometry, setting-out coordinates and visual progress records have different acceptance and accuracy requirements.

OpenSpace: a visual site record ↗Cariboo Memorial Hospital Redevelopment ↗Wye Road corridor upgrades ↗
Automation + reportingDynamo, Autodesk Platform Services, Power BI, SAP

Documented integrations help move or report information. They still need controlled inputs and verification.

John Horgan Dam and Generating Station, formerly Site C ↗Scarborough Subway Extension ↗
Project + cost managementProcore with Acumatica; Almanac predictive estimating

The Procore example is Canadian-firm evidence. The Almanac announcement concerns an estimating application, not a BIM authoring product.

Classic Fire and Life Safety ↗Almanac estimating application ↗
AI progress + operational analyticsBuildots / Plan Tracker, OpenSpace, Palantir; unnamed AI quality tools

Separate a project deployment from a corporate program and from future capabilities. Public validation results are limited in this source set.

Buildots: progress and planning ↗OpenSpace: a visual site record ↗Operational AI and analytics partnership ↗
AR + connected asset informationvGIS augmented reality, IoT moisture sensors, BIM asset records

Overlay, sensing and asset-record workflows solve different problems. The Centre Block owner update does not name a software brand.

Warsaw Road Swing Bridge replacement ↗AI quality monitoring: product unnamed ↗Centre Block rehabilitation ↗

IFC and COBie describe information exchanges; they are not competing authoring applications. Choose the format, required information and receiving check for the agreed use. See the handover guide and official learning references.

AI / SEPARATE THE USE FROM THE PROMISE

Where AI enters
the workflow.

Company announcements and project descriptions tell us where AI is being introduced. They do not establish universal accuracy, return on investment or permission to share project data.

Contractor rollout announcement2024-07-26 · Canadian contractor; firm-level deployment

Almanac estimating application

AlmanacPredictive AI

Pomerleau announced the first Almanac module, developed with Zetane, to support estimating decisions using historical bids and project characteristics. The article describes preconstruction managers using the tool, while automatic quantity extraction and wider estimating functions are presented as future possibilities. This is firm-level evidence and does not identify a public project using the system.

Read it correctly: No named Canadian project, public error-rate benchmark or independent ROI. Do not present future quantity extraction as a delivered feature.

Pomerleau: Using AI to Predict Project Costs ↗
Contractor corporate announcement2025-01-06 · Mississauga, Ontario announcement; firm-level program

Operational AI and analytics partnership

Palantir analytics and AI platform

EllisDon announced its Palantir partnership after work began in summer 2024. The company described a structured data environment as preparation for operational AI and stronger analytics. The same release discusses separate work with Scale AI on predictive construction supply-chain tools. It does not identify a named project or publish a measurable BIM-model outcome.

Read it correctly: Corporate announcement, not evidence that Palantir authors BIM models or is used on every EllisDon project. Future supply-chain capabilities are not verified delivered outcomes.

EllisDon Corporation via GlobeNewswire: EllisDon Announces Progress on Partnership with Palantir Technologies to Enhance Artificial Intelligence and Operational Efficiencies ↗
Contractor project accountNot stated; project page lists 2026 · Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island

OpenSpace: a visual site record

OpenSpaceAI-assisted visual documentation

Pomerleau identifies OpenSpace imagery and AI-assisted visual documentation at the Daniel J. MacDonald Building. This is a named Canadian project use.

Read it correctly: Product versions, validation results and measured savings are not supplied.

Pomerleau: Daniel J. MacDonald Building Modernization Project ↗
Contractor project accountNot stated; project page lists 2026 · Toronto, Ontario

AI quality monitoring: product unnamed

AI quality monitoring (product not named)

Pomerleau mentions AI quality monitoring alongside BIM, reality capture and timber moisture sensors at the Academic Wood Tower. The AI product is not identified.

Read it correctly: No product or measured AI result is named.

Pomerleau: University of Toronto Academic Wood Tower ↗
BRING THE LESSON BACKThe task.
The evidence.
The value.

A documented example is the start of your own check.

THE TRADE TAKEAWAY

Ask what changes
in your work.

  1. Name the output. A coordinated route, a fabrication package, a quantity, a field location or an accepted record.
  2. Check the complete workflow. Include preparation, licences, exchange, review, revisions and support.
  3. Test your example. Use authorised material and compare the output with a known result.
  4. Measure what matters. Record effort and rework. Separate capacity gained from cash saved.
Understand the cost and scope ↗
EDITORIAL RECORD / 17 OCTOBER 2026

Keep the date
with the claim.

Every example links to its original publisher. “Not stated” means the source did not provide a reliable publication date. Project locations identify the Canadian work; a Canadian company’s overseas project is not counted as a Canadian project. Versions, deployment extent and ongoing use are not inferred. Images are original editorial illustrations, not photographs of the named projects.

Coverage will grow as documented examples become available. Absence from this edition is not evidence that a tool is unused in Canada. There are no paid placements or implied partnerships in this collection.